Table Of Content
The Antitrust Task Force during the 110th Congress was established February 28, 2007, as a temporary subcommittee to examine the pending merger between XM Radio and Sirius Satellite Radio.[10] The task force operated like any other subcommittee, except that it only has a six-month term. The Supreme Court’s press office said in a statement Thursday afternoon that the orders do not contain justifications, but said the company and people with suspended accounts can gain access by requesting the decisions from the court. The Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee late Wednesday published a staff report disclosing dozens of decisions by Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordering X to suspend or remove around 150 user profiles from its platform in recent years.
Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement
The department has thus far refused to comply, citing laws and regulations that prevent it from disclosing details of open investigations, prompting Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, to suggest Mr. Garland be held in contempt of Congress. Due to the legal nature of the committee’s work it has been customary for members of the committee to have a legal background. In a time of great change and scientific progress an expanding list of issues, including intellectual property, cloning, and the internet, require committee members to possess a wide breadth of knowledge in order to effectively address concerns from these and other new areas. In the 118th Congress, the chairman of the committee is Republican Jim Jordan of Ohio, and the ranking minority member is Democrat Jerry Nadler of New York. In the U.S., free speech is a constitutional right that’s much more permissive than in other countries, including Brazil.
Saturday, April 27, 2024
And much of the specific evidence presented, particularly the testimony of an investigator who questioned key decisions in the Hunter Biden investigation, was given without context or acknowledgment of contradictory information. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland offered a fiery defense of the Justice Department’s investigation of Hunter Biden on Wednesday, telling a House committee he was “not Congress’s prosecutor” — and would not reveal details of the inquiry no matter how much pressure lawmakers applied. Procedures put in place to accommodate the pandemic restrictions have been reverted back to pre-pandemic practices. Teleconference testimony during committee hearings will no longer be available.
US House Judiciary Committee chair seeks details from ATF on airport director shooting - WATM
US House Judiciary Committee chair seeks details from ATF on airport director shooting.
Posted: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 03:15:12 GMT [source]
Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust
House Judiciary panel to consider Section 702 reauthorization bill - Roll Call
House Judiciary panel to consider Section 702 reauthorization bill.
Posted: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 08:00:00 GMT [source]
In one of his best-known cases, Mr. Garland was part of an appellate panel that in 2003 unanimously ruled that federal courts did not have standing to hear challenges from detainees at the Guantánamo Bay detention facility in Cuba. Representative Dan Bishop, Republican of North Carolina, is trying to get Garland to explain why he made Weiss a special counsel last month since little of his authority would appear to change. Garland demurs, saying he made Weiss a special counsel then because that’s when Weiss asked. It is a good question because it is not clear that the special counsel status makes much of a substantive difference. Representative Zoe Lofgren, Democrat of California, tells Garland that she wants to impose a requirement that the government get a warrant before it uses an American’s name or address to query a repository of messages intercepted under a surveillance law known as Section 702. That law, which grew out of the Bush administration’s post-9/11 warrantless wiretapping program, is set to expire at the end of this year unless Congress enacts new legislation to extend it.
United States House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary
De Moraes’ critics claim he has abused his powers and shouldn’t be allowed to unilaterally ban social media accounts, including those of democratically elected legislators. But most legal experts see his brash tactics as legally sound and furthermore justified by extraordinary circumstances of democracy imperiled. They note his decisions have been either upheld by his fellow justices or gone unchallenged. The chairman of the powerful Judiciary Committee, Mr. Jordan has the lead role in the oversight hearing where lawmakers will question Mr. Garland.
Subcommittees
Established in 1813, the House Judiciary Committee is the second oldest standing committee in Congress. Today, the Committee is at the forefront of some of the most significant issues facing our nation, including protecting constitutional freedoms and civil liberties, oversight of the U.S. Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, legal and regulatory reform, innovation, competition and anti-trust laws, terrorism and crime, and immigration reform. The Committee has jurisdiction over all proposed amendments to the Constitution, and each of its subcommittees has roots in that document.
“To comply with its obligations under U.S. law, X Corp. has responded to the Committee,” the company said in a statement on X on April 15. For President Joe Biden, it’s a story about money, influence, and protecting the Biden family brand. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond.
But the F.B.I. continues to investigate the president’s son, including whether he violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, commonly known as FARA, in his business dealings abroad. Affonso, also a professor of civil rights at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, said that the orders are legal but do merit debate, given users were not informed why their accounts were suspended and whether the action was taken by the platform or at the behest of a court. De Moraes has overseen a five-year probe of so-called “digital militias,” who allegedly spread defamatory fake news and threats to Supreme Court justices.
Latest Hearings
Under questioning from Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, Garland speaks about Ray Epps, a man swept up in a conspiracy theory that he was a covert government asset who helped instigate the attack on the Capitol. The narrative was largely based on the fact that Epps was never charged despite being at the Capitol on Jan. 6. Mr. Weiss’s team has signaled that it continues to investigate other elements of Mr. Biden’s business activities, most likely including whether any of his work with foreign interests violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which requires disclosure of lobbying activities for other countries. The decision to file criminal charges against Mr. Biden came after the collapse of a plea deal in July. Mr. Garland, whose voice was reduced to a ragged whisper after hours of constant back and forth, enjoyed only brief moments of respite when Republicans and Democrats on the committee turned their attention on one another. In response, Representative Eric Swalwell, Democrat of California, pointed out that Mr. Jordan, a close ally of Mr. Trump, was one of four Republicans to defy subpoenas issued by the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attacks when Democrats were in charge.
Late Wednesday, soon after the court orders were released, Bolsonaro capped off a speech at a public event by calling for a round of applause for Musk. On April 6, Musk took to X to challenge de Moraes, questioning why he was “demanding so much censorship in Brazil”. The following day, the tech mogul said he would cease to comply with court orders to block accounts — and that de Moraes should either resign or be impeached. Predicting that X could be shut down in Brazil, he instructed Brazilians to use a VPN to retain their access. The secret orders disclosed by the congressional committee had been issued both by Brazil’s Supreme Court and its top electoral court, over which de Moraes currently presides. Musk, a self-proclaimed free-speech absolutist, had vowed to publish de Moraes’ orders, which he equated to censorship.
Representative Ken Buck, Republican of Colorado and a member of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, was the rare Republican at this hearing defending Garland. A former federal prosecutor who has emerged as a leading Republican critic of the push to impeach President Biden without proof of corruption, Buck listed several examples in Garland’s career that demonstrated his independence and integrity. Buck suggested there was no decision Garland could make in the Hunter Biden case that would satisfy his critics.
No comments:
Post a Comment